2026-07-05

body


The latest on AI and jobs

Our friends at Ramp and Revelio Labs released fresh data on AI jobs impact, based on more than 21,000 US firms. They find that heavy adopters grow headcount faster, not slower. These firms increased employment by about 10% over two years after adopting AI. Entry-level roles grew even faster, at 12%.

[H]igh-intensity AI firms are selecting different kinds of candidates. In this case, we believe they are selecting for a new set of skills, specifically, people who know how to use AI and use it well. Entry-level workers, especially recent graduates and college students, are a natural place to look.

We’ve written before that the widely accepted narrative that AI replaces jobs is too simple – this still holds. The opposite claim, that there’s nothing to worry about, is simplistic as well. Labor markets are complex but we can make some assumptions about what’s going on:

First, complementarity. If AI makes workers more productive, firms may want more workers because the return on each additional hire rises.

Second, supervision. As AI-generated work increases, firms may need more people to manage, review and quality-control that output.

Third, demand expansion. If the cost per task falls, more tasks become viable. Latent demand becomes actual demand. (Exactly what has happened with computing since the 1970s.)[2]

Some firms are now learning that they fired people too quickly, mistaking task automation for human obsolescence. As we argued, the initial gains from AI show up in individual productivity, but the harder prize comes when firms redesign entire workflows and decision-making loops around it. There’s no evidence so far that humans aren’t needed in this redesign.

See also:


Open by necessity

US chip controls have driven China to treat open-source as resilience infrastructure, a new paper argues. Following each major US export control event since 2022, forking of LLM repos on GitHub jumped among China-linked developers but barely moved among US developers – 0.143 additional forks per repository-week for China vs 0.012 for the US, an 11x gap:

When uncertainty around upstream inputs rises, developers appear to increase engagement with open, locally runnable model infrastructure… [This is] a broader shift toward distributed innovation ecosystems that can expand participation, accelerate diffusion, and increase resilience under geopolitical and technological constraints.

Qwen and DeepSeek spread into research and commercial work globally almost as quickly as the best US models. But when authors examined US patents, the use of Chinese-origin models was rarely disclosed.

Another new paper suggests that Chinese innovation is becoming more self-reliant. The share of science produced in China that underlies domestic patents has grown from 1% in 2000 to 26% in 2025. China still builds on research done elsewhere, but domestic research is growing.

Source

See also:

Source


Progress needs maintenance

Brian Potter has a good essay on the return of the screwworm, a flesh-eating parasite that’s making a comeback on American farms. Sometimes we solve massive problems so well that we forget they were problems at all. And when the systems around the solution begin to deteriorate, the old problem returns. In Brian’s words:

By the 1930s, even with the best efforts of scientists and the use of the latest insecticides, repellents, and liver-baited traps, US livestock producers were losing the war.

A thorough eradication program eventually led to success

By 1963, the rate of screwworm cases in the US had fallen by 90%... and by 1966 screwworm had been eliminated from the entire US.

Decay followed…

As a result of this success, other screwworm facilities were shut down... Sometime around 2023, the barrier at Panama failed, and for the last several years screwworm has been marching north. It’s now reached the US.

Recommend reading the essay.


Short morsels to appear smart at dinner parties

👀 2,000 people tried to trick an OpenClaw assistant into leaking a secret without success.

Claude Opus 4.7 rebuilt a 16,000-line bioinformatics toolkit in 14 hours in a test on the MirrorCode benchmark (it cost $251). This work would take a human engineer weeks to complete.

Source

💭 Scott Alexander on the rise of AI superforecasters: “In the AI future, [prediction markets] accuracy won’t matter - consulting your favorite AI forecaster will be accurate enough, and much easier. But the canonicity will be more important than ever.”

💸 DeepSeek is raising peak-hour API prices after its aggressive discounting helped trigger China’s AI price war.

Need for memory:

[

X avatar for @bearlyai

Bearly AI@bearlyai

Bloomberg chart showing amount of RAM needed for AI data centres. Integrated server rack of 72 Nvidia Blackwell chips = same RAM as 1,000 high-end smartphones or 100s of "beefy PCs". Apple hiking prices is latest hit by memory bottelneck: ▫️Sony pushing next Playstation

Mark Gurman @markgurman

Power On: Apple’s sweeping price increases bring home the costs of the AI era for many people for the first time. https://t.co/Whcp3I0xKv

1:52 PM ¡ Jun 28, 2026 ¡ 36.4K Views


4 Replies ¡ ¡

](https://x.com/bearlyai/status/2071290707223187528)

Meta wants to sell excess AI computing capacity.

SpudCell may be the closest we’ve come to building a synthetic cell in a lab from scratch. (Awaiting peer review).


Thanks for reading!


  1. Jevons paradox: lower cost/higher availability of a resource leads to higher demand. More efficient coal mining led to more coal demand. ↩︎

  2. Jevons paradox: lower cost/higher availability of a resource leads to higher demand. More efficient coal mining led to more coal demand. ↩︎

  3. Sketchy. And Coherent is going through a photonics reset, so it's iffy too. ↩︎

  4. Tungsten has the highest melting point of any metal. ↩︎